Bills Sponsored Issue Areasīennett sponsored bills primarily in these issue areas: We consider a bill enacted if one of the following is true: a) it is enacted itself, b) it has a companion bill in the other chamber (as identified by Congress) which was enacted, or c) if at least about half of its provisions were incorporated into bills that were enacted (as determined by an automated text analysis, applicable beginning with bills in the 110 th Congress). But there are other legislative activities that we don’t track that are also important, including offering amendments, committee work and oversight of the other branches, and constituent services. 1240 (107th): Timpanogos Interagency Land Exchange Actĭoes 21 not sound like a lot? Very few bills are ever enacted - most legislators sponsor only a handful that are signed into law. 612 (108th): Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Boundary Revision Act 1427 (108th): Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 278 (108th): Mount Naomi Wilderness Boundary Adjustment Act 1876 (108th): Provo River Project Transfer Act 563 (111th): Utah Recreational Land Exchange Act of 2009 865 (111th): A bill to provide for the sale of the Federal Government’s reversionary interest in approximately 60 acres of land in Salt Lake City, Utah, originally conveyed to … Enacted Legislationīennett was the primary sponsor of 21 bills that were enacted. “This admonishment will hopefully highlight the requirement to refrain from endorsing nonjudicial candidates for public office for other part-time judicial officers,” the order reads.The chart is based on the bills Bennett sponsored and cosponsored In reaching its decision, the commission said it considered Bennett’s cooperation with the investigation, acknowledgement of responsibility and distinguished career as a public servant with no discipline history, as well as the fact that he’s no longer in judicial office. In addition, he said he was unexpectedly asked to introduce Senescu at the event and failed to consider how doing so may be construed as a public endorsement, the order says. “Rather, he was inattentive to his ethical obligations as a part-time judge when he supported a long-time family friend’s mayoral campaign,” the order reads. 3, alleging he violated the Code of Judicial Conduct by contributing to and publicly endorsing a nonjudicial candidate for public office.īennett “acknowledged his impropriety” and explained he did not act with bad intent, according to the order. Bennett was served with a statement of allegations Dec. The commission received an anonymous complaint in August and followed up with a confidential investigation. The commission also found that he was asked at the event to introduce Senescu and not beforehand. He did not reference his judicial position when introducing Senescu, nor did he identify his occupation when he made the campaign contributions. He previously served as a Clark County Superior Court judge for 21 years.Īccording to the stipulated facts of the case, Bennett has known Senescu and her husband for many years and considers them close friends. The city had previously decided not to renew his contract, which was unrelated to this matter. “The commission was very fair and reasonable in their resolution of the matter.”īennett was appointed to the judicial position in September 2012 and served through 2021. My actions were truthful, honest and generous, but I mistakenly failed to analyze them under the Judicial Code,” Bennett said in a written statement to The Columbian. “I was admonished by the Commission on Judicial Conduct for introducing and complimenting a political candidate at a meeting of her friends, and by donating to her campaign. The commission did not identify the candidate however, records from the Public Disclosure Commission show the contributions were made to Jennifer Senescu’s campaign. An admonishment is the least severe disciplinary action the commission can issue. The Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct last week issued a written admonishment against former part-time Battle Ground Municipal Court Judge Roger Bennett after he contributed to and publicly endorsed a Camas mayoral candidate last summer.īennett acknowledged he violated the Code of Judicial Conduct when he made two monetary donations, totaling $350, to the candidate’s campaign and introduced her at a June 9 campaign kickoff rally.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |